I'm tracing Joseph Monkhouse's story and "Cockermouth Union" keeps appearing so I thought I'd write a post about that institution.
In Victorian England, if you lost your mind and your money, the Poor Law system stepped in. The country divided itself into administrative districts called Poor Law Unions. Each Union - a cluster of parishes governed by a Board of Guardians - funded those who couldn't fund themselves. Cockermouth Union covered Joseph's care at Garlands asylum. The asylum kept two kinds of patients. Pauper patients, paid for by their local Union, lived in basic conditions. Private patients, who could afford their own fees, lived better. Different wards, and possibly better food and more freedom. When Joseph later returned as a private patient, his world changed. Perhaps he ate at a proper table. Perhaps he kept his own possessions.
Click here: Joseph Monkhouse
The Cockermouth Union. What It Meant for Cumberland
The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 reshaped Britain's welfare system.
Cockermouth Union emerged from this reform, responsible for parishes near the town, reaching toward Keswick, stretching to coastal Maryport, covering agricultural land and mining communities. Picture the territory. Farms losing workers to machines. Mines expanding but dangerous, subject to market collapse. Factories pulling people from traditional crafts. The Union dealt with all of it: displaced farmhands, injured miners, factory casualties.
The Workhouse on Sullart Street
In 1840, they built the workhouse. Two hundred inmates, separated by category. Able-bodied men here, women there, children somewhere else, the elderly in their corner, the infirm in theirs. The philosophy? Make public assistance unappealing. "Less eligibility," they called it. Keep conditions worse than the lowest-paying work. Stop people depending on the state. Families split on entry. Different wards, different labour. The austerity was deliberate. [Research task: What labour did they carry out from Cockermouth Workhouse?]
Mental Health and the Board of Guardians
For someone like Joseph, the Union held power over everything. The Board of Guardians could identify you, assess you, arrange a medical examination. They decided if you were "a lunatic" - that's what the law called it. They funded your transport to Garlands. They paid for your ongoing care. They reviewed your case to see if you still qualified for support.
When Joseph's records state "Union to which lunatic is chargeable: Cockermouth Union," I see the Board examining his case, finding him eligible, agreeing to pay from Union funds. Those funds came from local property taxes - "poor rates."
Economic Shifts in Cumberland
Who Ran the Union?
A Board of Guardians governed, composed of ex-officio members (local magistrates and landowners who gained positions automatically) and elected guardians (chosen by ratepayers from constituent parishes.) A clerk managed administrative affairs. A relieving officer assessed applications. Medical officers provided healthcare.
Victorian hierarchy concentrated power among local elites. Their decisions determined Joseph's fate. Did his mental illness qualify him for public assistance? What form would that assistance take?
What the Records Tell Us
The Cockermouth Union's records reveal patterns of poverty in rural Cumberland, early approaches to mental healthcare before modern psychiatry, social responses to disability and chronic illness, the struggle to balance compassion against limited funds, and class relationships in Victorian Cumberland.
When Joseph returned to Garlands as a private patient, he crossed a social boundary. He moved from charity recipient to fee-payer. In Victorian society, that shift meant everything. Understanding the Cockermouth Union helps me place Joseph's experience within broader social welfare systems. Mental illness existed at the intersection of medical care, public administration, and class hierarchies during this transformative period in British history.
A SELECTION OF ARTICLES FROM THE NEWSPAPERS OF THE DAY
Westmorland Gazette Saturday 26 September 1829
Content provided by THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ROBBERY AND ATTEMPTED MURDER.
On the night of Thursday last, as John Coulthard, a native of Ayr, in Scotland, with a fellow-labourer who called himself James ———, were travelling between Hesket and Cockermouth, in quest of employment, they became tired and lay down in a field near Ouse Bridge, where Coulthard fell asleep. About midnight, he was awakened by feeling some severe blows upon his head, and looking up he observed his companion lying upon him with a stone in his hand, with which he was striking him on the head with all his force. Coulthard made an attempt to extricate himself, but the assassin seized him by the neckerchief and endeavoured to choke him, at the same time demanding his money. The unfortunate victim, finding that the fellow was determined to murder him, surrendered up both his watch and money, consisting of two Carlisle guinea notes, (bank not known) and four shillings in silver. After having surrendered his property, the robber with a black-thorn walking-stick, struck him violently several times on the head and body, leaving him on the ground for dead. In the course of the struggle, Coulthard repeatedly called out "murder" as loud as he could, but his assailant, nothing deterred, seemed determined on taking his life, declaring that he "would put him from calling."
Coulthard believes the robber to be an Irishman, as he told him he came from the county of Down, and was by trade a blacksmith. He appeared to be about 25 years of age, 5 feet 10 or 11 inches high, blue eyes, fair complexion, light hair, very long in front, hanging down each side of his face—no whiskers; was dressed in a blue coat and waistcoat, corduroy trousers, much patched, and had on a leather apron; the heels of his shoes were caulkered with iron. He carried a bundle in which were a sailor's blue jacket and trowsers, a checked shirt, a scotch cap, and a white waistcoat.
The watch taken from Coulthard was made in Liverpool, the dial-plate somewhat defaced, the figure 5 being chipped out, and the figure 1 cracked; a steel chain with 2 slip-rings, and a swing-seal without a stone; on the watch-paper is the name of George Moore, Killtea.
An affidavit of the above particulars has been made by Coulthard (who now lies in a dangerous state at Cockermouth workhouse) before the Rev. Edward Fawcett, by whose directions copies of this statement have been forwarded to Carlisle, this town, Liverpool, Dublin, Drogheda, Belfast and Dumfries
Weekly Chronicle London Saturday 16 December 1848
Content provided by THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
CURE FOR VAGRANCY.
On Wednesday, a stout son of the Emerald isle presented himself for admission into the Cockermouth workhouse, earnestly desiring to be informed whether any meat was allowed in the establishment, for that he was kilt with travelling and dead with hunger. The fellow, who appeared about twenty four years of age, was searched, and there was found on him 2lbs 5oz of white and brown bread, 4oz of cheese, and a halfpenny. Pat was recommended by the master to practise frugality and independence, by using one half of the bread with the cheese for his supper, reserving the remainder for his breakfast, at which he could indulge in the luxury of having milk, if he paid for it with the solitary coin found in his pockets; adding that by way of paying for his lodging, if he required such, he must in the morning break a quarter of a yard of stones, or otherwise be detained at the work for four hours. The Emeralder set to work in the morning and completed his task within the prescribed time, but on leaving his temporary asylum he expressed a wish to see "his honour the master," saying, "By Gad, I'll publish his name far and wide, and in place of calling him Mister Davinson, I'll say he is the Devil's son, for it is a funny way of giving relief to poor creatures, when they get nothing but rest for their bones all night, to work it out of them in the morning."—Carlisle Patriot.
West Cumberland Times Saturday April 16 1881
Content provided by THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
THE COCKERMOUTH WORKHOUSE.
We have been favoured with an opportunity to explore the interior of the building which has of late given rise to so much controversy. Through all its day-rooms and dormitories, work-rooms, wash-rooms, laundries, and lavatories, wards, yards, school-rooms, store-rooms, kitchens, cellars -- everywhere, throughout its labyrinthian extent, we have been enabled to penetrate, under the careful pilotage of the obliging and courteous Workhouse Master, Mr. Storey.
It was with no intention to pass judgment on the building, as to its suitability or otherwise, that we visited the place and meandered through its tortuous intricacies. That has already been done by Dr Mouat, of the Local Government Board, and Dr Dodgson, the Medical Officer of the Workhouse. They each have presented a report, in which quite different opinions are enunciated. And when doctors disagree, we shall not attempt to decide. Both of them are, indeed, right in their conclusions. We think there could be no difficulty in proving either that the house exhibits all the defects described by Dr Mouat, or that it possesses all the capabilities with which it is credited by Dr Dodgson. The Workhouse, as it stands, may be either commended or condemned, according to the special idiosyncrasies of the individual who is called upon to pronounce judgment.
We can heartily sympathise with Dr Mouat in his complaint of the difficulty of examining and describing the house, seeing that it is, as he states, "built upon a plan which is now nearly unintelligible, from the manner in which it appears to have been added to from time to time, as the need of additional accommodation arose." It is truly an eccentric, unsystematised arrangement of builders' work. From the way in which the successive architects have proceeded, and the diversified uses to which the added buildings have been applied, one would imagine that the governing motive, both in the construction of the buildings and their subsequent utilisation, was to plan a succession of surprises to the uninitiated stranger. Almost every door opens upon the unexpected. Especially in passing from one to another of the lower apartments are we struck with their heterogeneity of uses. We do not doubt that each and every section of the variform structure is put to the use to which it is most conveniently appropriate. The defects are not in the management, but in the original arrangement. Imperfections of a temporary or accidental character were mentioned by Dr Mouat; but these have been remedied in every available instance. Were he now to revisit the Workhouse he would be compelled to slightly modify his former report. He would see cleanliness everywhere, and order wherever possible.
From the chamber in which vagrants and wayfarers are nightly kennelled to the more spacious sick wards and dormitories, the most scrupulous care is taken to keep matter in its right place. Certainly there is nothing in the shape of luxury within these walls; no unnecessary furnishings; no semblance of ornamentation anywhere. All is bare, blank, and barren; tidy, but cheerless; warm, without being comfortable. Could not the sick wards be made to look less dismal? The rows of beds, where lie the victims of misfortune, "stretched in diseases' shapes abhorred," are absolutely appalling in their dreary uniformity. Is it wholly necessary that the coarse coverlets should all be of the one dingy hue, or that no cheerful pictorial representations should relieve the naked monotony of the whitened walls? Here, truly, the dying have nothing in their immediate surroundings that is at all calculated to retard their departure; nothing that will add an additional pang of regret to their final leave-taking.
As we passed through one of the yards, a couple of aged paupers crossed in front of us, bearing betwixt them a something loosely wrapped in a bed-sheet. They carried it silently into the dead-house. The incident seemed almost unnoticed by the other inmates, no one deigning to cast a look towards the unconscious clay. To the Workhouse Master it was but one less on the list of the "aged and infirm." That was all. He had eaten his last pauper ration; the last perfunctory prayer had been said for the poor soul just passing away; the last sad offices were being performed by strange and callous hands. Wrap the coarse grave-clothes round him; nail over him the nameless coverele; thrust him into the Union hearse; and "rattle his bones over the stones, he's only a pauper whom nobody owns."
Well may the honest poor have a terror of the Workhouse. It is a terribly gloomy lodging, very unlike those provided for John Bunyan's pilgrims as they approach the end of their weary journey. Some of these old men and women have had a hard fight with the world, from their cradle upwards; and their lives would have been still more embittered could they have foreseen what awaited them in their helpless age—could they have discerned the gloomy portals through which they must pass in the final stages of their pilgrimage. But if to the old and the world-weary it be a dismal place in which to sit down and patiently "shuffle off this mortal coil," how much more unsuitable must it be as the home of childhood. The buoyant hopefulness of the child-nature is stifled by the depressing atmosphere of the place, and by the artificial constraints to which the children are subjected.
We were introduced into the boys' school-room, where sat the schoolmaster, Mr Hudson, in the midst of about fifty juveniles, laboriously engaged in the customary didactic exercises. The nephew of the Railway King has a difficult, but withal congenial task. Apparently it yields him some enjoyment, else he could not throw into his work such conspicuous energy as characterises it from day to day, with the exceptional results that are noted by Her Majesty's Inspector of Schools at each annually-recurring examination. His pupils are by no means remarkable for natural aptness and docility. They are brought to him at various ages, and in all stages of neglect. Fresh comers at the age of ten or twelve years are frequently found unable to name a single letter of the alphabet, proving that the compulsory system which has been introduced of late years is not everywhere duly enforced. Then, possibly, just as he has succeeded, after great labour, in enlightening them in the abecedarian mysteries, they are suddenly removed from the Workhouse and from beneath his training hand.
Most of the children, however, have no other home. There are bright boys among them, too, unpromising as was their original condition, and unadapted as are all their present surroundings for opening and enlarging the juvenile mind. The crowded school-room, the great blank day-room, the paved yard, circumscribed and shelterless, are miserable substitutes for the natural home life, the family circle, and the freedom which is the natural heritage of the poorest. Within a space just 30ft. by 15ft. ground measurement, and 10ft. in height, there are sometimes about seventy children congregated during several hours of each school day. The girls' school-room was unoccupied at the time of our visit, owing to the temporary indisposition of the schoolmistress. Her illness need not be wondered at, if the like insalubrious conditions exist in her department as in that of Mr Hudson. How he manages to preserve his health and robust appearance under such conditions, combined with the wearying, worrying nature of his daily occupation, is more than we can at present understand. True, as we have already observed, his heart appears to be in his work; his sympathies are with his boys. When he is not teaching them their lessons he is assisting them in their play. Thus their young lives are not only made endurable, but enjoyable.
Every other part of the building is pervaded by a mournful apathy, a lugubrious listlessness, as though it were eternally overshadowed by Poe's inexorable raven; but where the children are, the shadow is occasionally dispelled under the recurrent gleams of natural cheerfulness and vivacity. Mr Hudson is the Coryphaeus of Workhouse schoolmasters. His vocation is somewhat different to that of his uncle of railway notoriety, and somewhat differently remunerated. He has never cleared his £100,000 in a day, as is said to have once been done by his relative and namesake; but he is nevertheless doing a more worthy work in the world than was ever done by the great dealer in scrip and dictator of railway speculations.
The Workhouse is by no means crowded at the present time. On the day of our visit it contained 253 inmates—80 men and 76 women of all classes, and 97 children of both sexes, including the "motherless and deserted infants and the very young children" mentioned in Dr Dodgson's report as occupying a ward in the detached portion of the building located at the foot of the garden. In the winter season there are necessarily more extensive demands on the accommodation. As is well known, the Guardians propose to increase the domiciliary space by projecting a bridge from the south front of the building across the railway into the adjoining potato field, and erecting at the outward end of the bridge a series of buildings to be used as schools, day-rooms, and dormitories for the boys and girls. The proposal is endorsed by Dr Dodgson, who would add an hospital for their lodgment when requiring the special attention of the Medical Officer. On the other hand, Dr Mouat affirms that the proposed removal of the juvenile cantonment "is not desirable in itself, and would not afford the relief intended and anticipated."
For our own part we think the accommodation is capable of very considerable extension without extending it across the railway. A great deal of the space within the existing boundaries is only imperfectly utilised. Along the interior of the south wall is a large area of ground that might be occupied with more useful buildings than those by which it is now encumbered. The colony of pigs, for instance, located near the south-east entrance, might be removed elsewhere, with advantage to the human denizens, and their removal would leave nearly as much clear ground as is required for the additional buildings. Might not portions of the south wall be extended a few feet nearer to the railway, or even built plumb from the bottom of the cutting? This plan of extension is much more preferable than the erection of a costly bridge, with a detached supplementary building in the midst of a potato field, and its adoption by the Guardians and the Local Government Board would put an end to the Workhouse question for our time at least.
West Cumberland Times Saturday November 14 1891
Content provided by THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
COCKERMOUTH WORKHOUSE REVISITED.
Sir,—With the members of my family, now in England, I paid a visit, at the invitation of Mr W. French, the master I paid a visit to the workhouse at Cockermouth. That the visit was a most enjoyable one in every respect, goes without saying. Years ago I was in the habit of assisting at the Christmas entertainments provided by the townspeople for the old-time inmates at that time, with its bare whitewashed walls, black painted doors, and furniture, the interior of the building was as gloomy as can well be imagined, in fact the inside of a gaol would be an appropriate simile. Now I am delighted to find the place thoroughly transformed into a structure, which, if not exactly palatial, is, at all events, comfortable, bright, and cheerful, as an abode for the poor unfortunate people whom the buffettings and ups and downs of this life have driven to the shelter of its walls.
And here let me confess that some years ago, when, in far-off Australia I read in my "West Cumberland Times" an agitation for the erection of a new workhouse, I was inclined to coincide with the cry, and, I am not afraid of the opposition, as a matter of very decided un-enlightenment. The great changes I noticed in the general aspect of the workhouse this week, however, unquestionably show that the wisdom lay the other way, and that everything needed has been accomplished at a comparatively trifling expenditure of the ratepayers' money, thanks, also, to the practical taste and inventive faculties of Mr French. It would take up too much of your valuable space were I to go into details; but it will suffice if I say that the tasteful colouring of the walls and dados ward, pictures, and other simple adornments, not to omit painting, have worked wonders, while the structural alterations here and there are improvements of a permanent character. The old dining hall, moreover, with its neat fine furniture, serving the double purpose of dinner service and chapel sitting, is a revelation I little expected. In short, I begin to think there is, after all, something rational in the reviled and ridiculed creed of Mr Oscar Wilde, the high priest of aestheticism. By the way, Mr John Musgrave, the veteran clerk to the Guardians, informs me that a number of other improvements are in contemplation.
A few words as to the inmates may be permitted. I commence with the little children in the nursery, pictures of health, cleanliness, and neatness, who smilingly and heartily went through their calisthenic exercises; besides which it is gratifying to see Mr and Mrs French are putting a polish on them in the shape of good manners, another evidence of latter-day enlightenment, surely, even though it be within the walls of a workhouse. The grown-up people seem to be contented and happy, and an improved and enlarged dietary scale from the old days is doubtless answerable for the change. While on this point, however, it is obvious that some classification is required, that might be easy of accomplishment. In the "mixed" community of a workhouse there is always a sprinkling of old ladies especially who have seen better days, and have naturally moved in a respectable circle of life. It is on behalf of these poor people—in many instances through little or no fault of their own—that I plead; and I think they ought to be placed in a separate ward, apart from the women, whose foul language and rough manners must be a cruel annoyance to them. I am pleased to say that Mr and Mrs French are both advocates of a system like that I have indicated. By way of analogy I can point out a similar classification in the case of some of the Australian prisons; that is, the separation of first offences (educated young people) from hardened criminals, by order of the judge who tries them.
In conclusion, may I add that Mr and Mrs French are models of what the master and the matron of a workhouse should be. Discipline —not of a martinet style—is everywhere apparent; and the inmates, one and all, observe an air of respect and obedience towards the officials that has not a shadow of restraint or discontent about it.—Faithfully yours, W. F. LAMONBY. Cockermouth, Nov. 11th, 1891
Maryport Advertiser Saturday September 16 1899
Content provided by THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
A REALLY INTERESTING CENTENARIAN
The next memorandum in my note book has reference to a really interesting centenarian. I have more than once remarked with reference to real or alleged centenarians that in many cases they either survived all their children, or left so few descendants behind them, as to suggest the idea that centenarianism in their case was a mere freak. But very different was the case of Jane Owen. Her death is thus recorded:—"At the Union Workhouse, Cockermouth, on November 13, 1850, Mrs. Jane Owen, aged 99 years and 7 months, and has left behind her 10 children, the eldest in her 78th year, 55 grandchildren, 70 great grandchildren, and four great great grandchildren, and a sister living at Great Clifton in the 93rd year of her age. Her remains were interred at Brigham on Friday, and followed to the grave by four generations, viz., children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and one great great grandchild. Her eldest grandchild is 50, and her eldest great grandchild 27." But Jane Owen—notwithstanding all her children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and great great grandchildren—died in Cockermouth Workhouse!
Hull Daily Mail Thursday January 17 1901
Content provided by THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
PYJAMAS V NIGHTDRESS. GUARDIANS ON THE ETHICS.
The Guardians of the Cockermouth Union have resolved by 19 votes to 18 to provide the children in the workhouse with nightgowns.
This momentous decision was come to after an amusing discussion.
Mr Ross said nightshirts kept people only partially warm, and were rather a nuisance than otherwise (laughter). He suggested that they should provide pyjamas or combinations, and Mr Briggs said they should be glad that the children got good day shirts, let alone night shirts (hear, hear).
The Rev. J. Neale said he supposed all the members of the Board wore nightshirts, but this elicited a cry of "No, no." It was, he urged, far healthier to have a change on retiring to rest. It seemed frivolous to refuse them.
Mr Mitchell, however, said he did not think anyone wore them, and Mr Brown said nightshirts were not provided in the army and navy.
Mrs Sandwith said they were supposed to improve the children in their manners and methods of life, and it was rather a horrible idea to allow the same garment to serve day and night for over a week.
The result of the division, a majority of one for the nightshirts, was greeted with cheers.
Workington Star Friday May 17 1901
Content provided by THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
COCKERMOUTH UNION. WANTED - LAUNDRY MAID For Union Workhouse Cockermouth. Wages, £20 per annum.
Particulars as to duties may be had on application to Mr. French, the Master. By Order, J. H. MUSGRAVE, Clerk.
Also see: Hunt, E.H. (1986) 'Industrialization and Regional Inequality: Wages in Britain, 1760-1914', The Journal of Economic History, 46(4), pp. 935-966.
Also see: https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/ This digital archive is maintained by the University of Portsmouth and is free to access. It combines historical surveys, census data and statistical information in a user-friendly interface that doesn't require specialised academic knowledge to navigate.
The wage data is valuable because it's presented with regional variations across Britain, allowing people to understand how earnings differed between urban centres and rural areas. This is especially important when studying the Cockermouth Union workhouse, as rural wages differed from urban rates.
The site includes statistical tables showing occupational wages across different time periods, with good coverage of the early 20th century. Users can examine trends in purchasing power and compare wages across different occupations from manual labourers to skilled trades.
What makes this resource especially accessible is that it contextualises the wage information with cost of living data, allowing users to understand what these wages actually meant in terms of standard of living, something raw numbers alone can't convey.
The site also provides interactive maps and visualisation tools that make the data more comprehensible. The visual elements help users grasp regional wage disparities and how they evolved throughout the 20th century.
For someone interested in workhouse history specifically, the site includes information about poor relief systems and institutional employment that provides good context for understanding the £20 annual wage mentioned in the newspaper advertisement above.
